The relationship between King Charles and Meghan Markle has evolved over the years, transitioning from curiosity and caution to mutual respect. While the current dynamics between the king and the former Duchess of Sussex remain largely private, insights from royal observers reveal a surprising and endearing detail: a special nickname that Charles reportedly gave Meghan.
A Surprise Announcement
When Prince Harry began dating Meghan Markle, then-Prince Charles was reportedly taken aback. According to royal experts Omid Scobie and Carolyn Durand in their book Finding Freedom: Harry and Meghan and the Making of the Modern Royal Family, Charles had no prior knowledge of the relationship. The first time he was informed came just 20 minutes before the news became public, leaving him and his team at Clarence House stunned.
The news reportedly left the then-Prince of Wales “crushed,” not out of personal disapproval of Harry’s choice, but because of the timing. At the moment, Charles was preparing for a sensitive tour of the Middle East, and the announcement threatened to overshadow his royal duties.
“It was a critical moment that had been in the works for months,” the authors wrote. “A statement from Kensington Palace condemning the Press and, in the same breath, confirming Harry’s new girlfriend would all but eliminate coverage of Prince Charles’s tour of the Gulf.”
The meticulous planning for the tour meant that media attention on Harry’s relationship could divert coverage from the official engagements Charles had worked to organize. As Scobie and Durand noted, the team at Clarence House had invested significant effort to ensure the tour received proper attention, only to have the announcement of Harry’s new romance potentially overshadow it.
Understanding Amidst Disappointment
Despite the initial shock, Charles reportedly understood the couple’s need to make their relationship public. The royal authors highlighted that while he was “disappointed” by the timing, he accepted that Harry and Meghan had their own priorities in sharing the news with the world.
This early phase illustrates the delicate balance royal figures often maintain between personal life and public duties. While Charles’ schedule and responsibilities as heir to the throne were demanding, he also recognized the importance of Harry and Meghan’s autonomy in their personal decisions.
Growing Bonds
Over time, the relationship between Charles and Meghan strengthened. Meghan transitioned from being his son’s girlfriend to his daughter-in-law, and Charles played an important role during their wedding, walking her down the aisle when her father was absent. Observers suggest that during this period, Charles came to admire Meghan’s resilience, independence, and the support she provided to Harry.
According to palace insiders, Charles appreciated Meghan not only for her poise in the public eye but also for the strength she brought to the couple’s partnership. This admiration was expressed in a unique way: he reportedly gave her a nickname that reflected her character.
“Tungsten”: A Term of Endearment
Royal commentator Charlotte Griffiths, writing for the Mail in 2018, revealed that Charles called Meghan “Tungsten.” Tungsten, a chemical element known for having the highest melting point, symbolized Meghan’s resilience and fortitude. Griffiths explained that the nickname was meant as a term of endearment, reflecting both admiration and affection.
“Prince Charles (now King Charles) admires Meghan for her strength and the backbone she gives Harry, who needs a tungsten-type figure in his life as he can be a bit of a softy. It’s become a term of endearment,” Griffiths wrote.
The nickname highlights a deeper layer of royal family dynamics. Meghan’s determination and support for Harry provided balance within the couple’s relationship, while Charles recognized her influence as both empowering and stabilizing.
The Role of Royal Etiquette and Protocol
The relationship between Charles and Meghan also underscores the complexities of royal protocol. Marrying into the royal family entails navigating long-standing traditions, expectations, and public scrutiny. Meghan, as an American and a high-profile actress, entered this world with unique challenges. Charles’ acknowledgment of her strength demonstrates an appreciation for the personal qualities required to thrive within such an environment.
Furthermore, Charles’ support during critical moments—such as walking Meghan down the aisle—reflects the nuanced ways royals manage personal relationships while fulfilling public roles. Such actions convey a balance between family loyalty and the broader expectations of monarchy.
Challenges in Public Perception
Public perception of Charles’ relationship with Meghan has been shaped by media coverage, speculation, and the couple’s own narratives. While insiders report that the bond between the king and Meghan remains cordial, outside observers often speculate on potential tensions. Nevertheless, the nickname “Tungsten” suggests a genuine personal admiration that goes beyond public narratives.
The story also highlights the difference between perceived tension and actual interpersonal dynamics within the royal family. While the monarchy is subject to intense public scrutiny, private interactions—such as Charles’ admiration for Meghan—offer a more complex picture.
Reflections on Leadership and Family
Charles’ relationship with Meghan reflects broader themes relevant to monarchy and leadership. Supporting family members while managing a high-profile role requires empathy, strategic judgment, and an understanding of human dynamics. Charles’ recognition of Meghan’s strength illustrates a leader’s capacity to value resilience, even when it challenges traditional expectations.
In many ways, the nickname “Tungsten” serves as a metaphor for royal leadership itself: enduring, steadfast, and able to withstand intense pressure. Meghan’s influence, as recognized by Charles, exemplifies how personal qualities can impact both familial and institutional dynamics.
Public Interest and Legacy
The public remains fascinated by the interactions between Charles and Meghan, particularly given the couple’s decision to step back from senior royal duties. Their story resonates because it intertwines themes of family loyalty, public duty, personal strength, and societal expectations.
As King Charles continues to navigate his role, both domestically and internationally, his relationship with Meghan serves as a reminder that monarchy is as much about human relationships as it is about ceremonial responsibilities. The admiration and respect implied by the nickname offer a glimpse into the personal dimensions of royal life that often go unnoticed by the public eye.
The Importance of Personal Recognition
The nickname also underscores the importance of personal recognition within the family. While the royal family often operates under strict formalities, moments of personal acknowledgment—such as Charles’ term of endearment—highlight the humanity behind the institution.
Observers suggest that these small gestures can have significant impact, reinforcing bonds, validating individual contributions, and fostering trust within the family. Meghan’s experience demonstrates that even within a structured hierarchy, personal resilience and support are recognized and valued.
Concluding Thoughts
King Charles’ relationship with Meghan Markle, from initial surprise to respect and admiration, reflects the complex interplay between duty, personal relationships, and public life. The nickname “Tungsten” serves as a lasting symbol of Charles’ appreciation for Meghan’s strength, resilience, and the support she provides Harry.
While many details of their current interactions remain private, this glimpse into royal dynamics highlights that behind public appearances and media coverage, the monarchy is deeply shaped by personal connections and mutual respect.
Do you think King Charles is a good monarch? Please share your thoughts in the comment section.